Login
iscover
The Human Rights Law Centre says the government must strengthen protections in the wake of Richard Boyle’s failed appeal.
Newsletter
ATO whistleblower prosecution to have ‘chilling effect’
25 June 2024
•
12 minute read
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The continued prosecution of a former ATO employee who blew the whistle on its aggressive debt collection tactics will have a “chilling effect” on other public servants’ willingness to report misconduct, legal advocates say.
The Human Rights Law Centre said Richard Boyle's failed appeal in the South Australian Court of Appeal underscored the failings of Australia's whistleblower laws, calling on the government to strengthen protections.
Current laws only covered the act of whistleblowing, not “reasonably necessary” prior conduct, according to Justices David Lovell, Samuel Doyle and Sophie David in their judgment last week.
==
==
Senior lawyer Kieran Pender said Boyle’s continued prosecution was not in the public interest and had a “chilling effect” on prospective whistleblowers.
“By exposing human rights violations, government wrongdoing and corporate misdeeds, whistleblowers make Australia a better place. When whistleblowers stay silent, wrongdoing goes unchecked and our democracy suffers," he said.
Boyle’s disclosures as a former ATO debt collector precipitated a parliamentary inquiry that criticised the ATO's tactics while a separate IGTO inquiry confirmed his concerns over the excessive use of garnishee notices.
However, he was charged with 24 offences, including misuse of sensitive information, telephone tapping and recording of conversations without consent.
In March last year, the South Australian District Court ruled he was not immune from prosecution under whistleblower protections.
Following Boyle’s failed appeal last week, he is now expected to face trial in September and could face up to 46 years in prison.
The Human Rights Law Centre said the ruling confirmed the narrow scope of protections available for whistleblowers in Australia.
It said the case followed other high-profile whistleblower prosecutions that also proceeded despite independent inquiries or litigation vindicating the allegations of wrongdoing.
These included Witness K and Bernard Collaery, who exposed Australia’s espionage against Timor-Leste, and Afghan Files whistleblower David McBride, recently sentenced to almost six years’ imprisonment.
Kieran said Australia’s whistleblower protection laws were in “urgent need of comprehensive, robust reform”.
“Before the last election the Albanese Government promised to fix federal public sector whistleblowing laws – it must honour that commitment before the end of the current parliamentary term,” he said.
“The government should also commit to establishing a whistleblower protection authority, to oversee and enforce whistleblowing laws and support whistleblowers.”
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
